About Spyda TrustScore
We're building the future of security scoring. Spyda TrustScore unifies fragmented security data into a single, actionable metric that development and security teams can trust.
Our Mission
Eliminate security tool sprawl and make risk assessment fast, accurate, and confidence-weighted
The Problem
Security teams use 10+ scanning tools that generate thousands of findings. Most alerts are false positives, and no single score exists to answer: "How secure is this project?"
Our Solution
Spyda consolidates SAST, SCA, DAST, container scans, and quantum readiness into one TrustScore—with tool credibility weighting, policy governance, and AI-assisted triaging.
Why Spyda Exists
Security buying broke because the two questions that matter got merged into one. Procurement teams, assessors, and security leaders kept asking “how good is this?” and “can we ship it?” — and vendors answered both with a single marketing number. A green score next to a known-exploited vulnerability is not confidence. It is a liability.
Spyda was built to separate those questions permanently. The measurement axis tells you how strong a project's security posture is. The admissibility verdict tells you whether policy gates allow release. A high score can never silently override a failed security gate — that is enforced in the engine, not in a slide deck.
We are deliberately conservative about what we claim. Where controls are designed to align with a standard but not yet certified, we say exactly that. For a company whose product is trust, overstating compliance is the fastest way to lose it.
Who Built It
Spyda is built by a team with backgrounds in application security, vulnerability research, compliance engineering, and quantitative risk modelling — the same disciplines we ask buyers to trust.
Security Engineering
Practitioners who have run SAST, SCA, DAST, and container programs at scale and lived with the false-positive flood.
Risk & Methodology
Quantitative modelling of confidence, exploitability, and domain risk — published as a versioned, reviewable whitepaper.
Compliance & Assurance
Experience preparing for SOC 2, ISO 27001, and GDPR programs — which is why our claims map to evidence, not aspiration.
Why the Methodology Is Defensible
A trust score is only as good as its ability to survive scrutiny from an assessor. Spyda's scoring is published, versioned, and reproducible.
Published & versioned
The scoring engine implements the SpyderWeb TrustScore v2.6.4 whitepaper, with the numeric scoring register frozen at v2.4. Every formula — confidence, priority, domain decay, and the composite — is written down and reviewable rather than hidden.
Two disjoint axes that cannot contradict
Posture (the score) and deployability (the verdict) are computed and displayed separately. Deployability is governed solely by policy gates, so a strong number cannot mask a blocking security failure.
Non-waivable security gates
Known-exploited (KEV) findings are evaluated across all findings and cannot be cleared by an ordinary waiver. Gate class and waivability are frozen in the engine, not editable in a buyer policy.
Signed, reproducible evidence
Each evidence pack seals the verdict, engine constants, and version tuple with a reproducible hash, so an independent party can verify that a result was not altered after the fact.
What We Stand For
Transparency First
Every TrustScore is explainable. See exactly which scanners contributed, how confidence was calculated, and why findings were weighted the way they were.
Developer Velocity
Security shouldn't slow teams down. Spyda integrates with existing CI/CD pipelines, normalizes data instantly, and surfaces only what matters.
Built for Teams
DevOps, AppSec, and compliance teams need different views. Spyda provides role-based dashboards, policy governance, and audit trails for every stakeholder.
How It Works
Universal Ingestion
Connect any scanner via our REST API or CLI. Spyda normalizes findings from Trivy, Snyk, SonarQube, OWASP ZAP, and 20+ other tools into a unified data model.
Confidence Weighting
Not all scanners are equal. Spyda assigns credibility scores based on tool maturity, false positive rates, and domain expertise—so findings from authoritative sources carry more weight.
Policy-Based Scoring
Define custom policies for different risk profiles: PCI-DSS compliance, zero-trust posture, post-quantum readiness. Each policy generates its own TrustScore aligned with your priorities.
Continuous Monitoring
Track TrustScore trends over time. Get alerts when scores drop, see remediation impact in real-time, and prove compliance with audit-ready reports.
Ready to Unify Your Security Posture?
Join teams using Spyda to make faster, more confident security decisions.